Mehmet Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Story

Mehmet <span id="more-8711"></span>Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Story

Mehmet Hassan had no basic proven fact that Leonie Granger, entering the casino with him here as seen on surveillance video, could be their death trap.

Three individuals had been found accountable of killing Mehmet Hassan, a gambler that is professional was killed in his London home back in March 2014.

The murder took place after Hassan was lured in by a female he knew as ‚Rachel,‘ whom then allowed two other guys access to their flat, where he had been killed.

But ‚Rachel‘ was actually 25-year-old Leonie Granger, who came across Hassan in a Mayfair casino shortly before his murder.

In the of the killing, Hassan took Granger to the Palm Beach Casino and gave her money to gamble with night. They then traveled back to Hassan’s Islington flat.

Granger Set Robbery Plot in Motion

But Hassan was unaware that Granger ended up being actually dealing with her boyfriend, Kyrron Jackson, and their friend, Nicholas Chandler, setting up a plot. She made certain that the duo gained access to the flat before she left.

The two men then tied up Hassan before brutally kicking him to death. Chances are they tore through his home looking for the money they thought to be stashed in the apartment, into a bank account as he was known to keep cash in his home, rather than depositing it.

Eventually, they found the cash. a video clip on Granger’s mobile phone revealed the three defendants having fun with numerous 50 that is&pound$74) bills, stuffing them into their pants and throwing them around an area, as well as one pretending to alleviate himself on bills scattered across the floor of the flat.

Prosecutors say the video was made after Hassan’s death, while it had been claimed by the defense was actually made four months earlier and was unrelated to the case.

But jurors were convinced that the three defendants were responsible for Hassan’s death, and all three were found guilty. Jackson and Chandler were convicted of murder, while Granger was found bad associated with the smaller fee of manslaughter for her role within the crime.

Once the verdicts were delivered, Chandler started to swear and lash out in the courtroom, forcing protection officers to remove him from the court. Granger admitted to being part of an agenda to rob Hassan, but stated she had no role that is direct the murder, which may have led to her reduced conviction.

Jackson, Chandler Had History of Violent Crime

This was not the very first time that Jackson and Chandler had been included in violent crimes. In January and February of 2014, the set was indeed tangled up in two armed robberies at A southern Kensington casino. In each of those instances, victims had been tied up and the males carried firearms during the robberies.

Mehmet Hassan took Granger, who delivered under a name that is different to gamble on his dime at London’s Palm Beach Casino Club. (Image: PA)

Hassan ended up being a revered member of the London live casino gambling scene, and was said to frequently play poker at the Palm Beach Casino Club.

‚He was a wonderful warm man…and he’d gamble on anything,‘ Hendon Mob founder Ross Boatman told the London Evening Standard after his death. ‚He loved to gamble and, win or lose, it never affected him. He was always smiling, constantly upbeat.‘

Jackson and Chandler were also convicted on costs of robbery, conspiracy to imprison that is falsely as well as other charges. Following the verdicts were read, Judge William Kennedy told the defendants them to face severe punishments for their crimes that he expected.

‚You will return right here for sentence on 28 April,‘ Kennedy said tuesday. ‚I think you face very significant [time] and immediate custody.‘

IOC Adopts Sports Betting Integrity Proposals

The IOC will implement recommendations that are new help combat corruption and match-fixing. (Image: IOC)

The Global Olympic Committee (IOC) has determined to follow several new proposals to guard the integrity of Olympic sporting events after the first ever meeting of this International Forum for Sports Integrity (IFSI) in Lausanne on Monday.

This new initiatives will take care of numerous areas of the sports globe, including several that are focused on the activities industry that is betting.

Often, industry groups resist increased scrutiny and oversight, but that doesn’t be seemingly problem in this case.

Most regulated sports betting operations are in benefit of protecting the integrity of games by any means possible, as it protects their businesses as much as it helps the IOC, other recreations organizations, players and fans.

As an example, the European Sports Security Association (ESSA) has stated before it starts that they will be happy to work with the IOC to help stop match fixing.

‚we have been pleased we could be part of this effort,‘ ESSA Chairman Mike O’Kane said. ‚These measures are a milestone that is important the drive by sporting bodies and the regulated betting industry to keep sport clean and protect consumers, regulated betting operators and athletes from unscrupulous activities.‘

Hotline to permit for Anonymous Tips

One of many major initiatives from the IOC would have been a whistleblower hotline that may allow individuals to report feasible match-fixing or other corruption to the IOC.

The hotline, which will be based online, will offer you complete anonymity to anyone who would like to use it, from members associated with the public to athletes, coaches or referees.

During the IFSI, governments worldwide were also strongly encouraged to sign on to the Council of European countries’s convention against match-fixing, which ensures that local and laws that are national for cooperation with criminal investigations into match-fixing operations and properly punish practices that threaten the integrity of sporting competitions.

‚When it comes to the fight against manipulation and related corruption, sport needs the help and cooperation of governments and authorities that are governmental other stakeholders much significantly more than in just about any other area,‘ said IOC President Thomas Bach.

The IOC is not taking all of the responsibility for preventing issues that are match-fixing sports worldwide, however. The organization says that FIFA and (in Europe) UEFA should still be the organizations that are go-to whistleblowers who want to fight match-fixing in soccer.

And when it comes to show drugs that are enhancing people with information should contact national organizations associated with the World Anti-Doping Agency.

No ‚Test‘ for Match-Fixing

According to Bach, the hotline that is new necessary since it is much harder to detect when a contest could be fixed when compared with sniffing out cheaters who are taking unlawful substances.

‚you cannot detect corruption and match-fixing by firmly taking a bloodstream test,‘ Bach said. ‚we are in need of the help and assistance of governments and police authorities who possess more power and much more information and more possibilities than sport may have.‘

O’Kane agreed with that evaluation, saying that education, partnerships and also the effective change of information is central to how both the ESSA and the IOC want to protect the integrity of recreations.

‚Credit should go towards the IOC for continuing to include all responsible stakeholders in its integrity discussions once the best and way that is only be effective in this area,‘ O’Kane stated. ‚As responsible, regulated betting operators we want to share data on match-fixing and all sorts of countries should ratify the Council of Europe Convention, which will allow operators to share confidential data in an environment that is protected established national platforms.‘

California Internet Poker Committee Hearings Due Before End of April

Ca will hold hearings on the poker that is online this month, but is there any expect regulation unless Pechanga has a big change of heart? (Image: blog.sfgate.com)

Ca is likely to get Senate that is joint and on the web poker committee hearings before May 1, which is the due date for policy committees to hear fiscal bills.

That means hearings are likely to occur later on this month, helped along by the very fact that sponsors of the latest two ’shell‘ bills, Senator Isadore Hall and Assemblyman Adam Gray, are chairs of Senate and Assembly Government Organization committees.

‚Nothing was finalized or approved, however the chairs of each committee are thinking about keeping a few joint hearings that are informational the issue so all the new people of every committee have better knowledge of the complexities of Internet gambling,‘ Senate GO Committee Director Art Terzakis said this week.

Terzakis had been unable to express just what the agenda of the hearing would look like and who does be testifying, explaining ‚it’s too very early for that.‘

In reality, he believes the first hearing may be ‚just an overview of gambling in Ca.‘

Insufficient Consensus

Regardless of this small shift within the right direction, the passage of an on-line poker bill in 2015 stays an unlikely prospect; a recently available report by Morgan Stanley said 3d slots demo it foresaw no states opting to manage in 2015, even though it thought that California, along side Pennsylvania, New York and Illinois, would do so inside the ’next few years.‘

At the heart of the issue in California could be the intransigence of the many stakeholders that are different the language of the bills. Along with Hall and Gray’s shell bills, which presently contain no language to speak of, two other bills have been introduced this legislative session.

Assemblyman Mike Gatto’s AB9 would permit just tribal operators and card spaces to submit an application for on-line poker licenses, while Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer’s AB167 would include the state’s racetracks.

Gatto’s bill, meanwhile, includes strict bad star language which may bar an operator like PokerStars from entering industry, while the Jones-Sawyer bill is much softer in its bad actor stance compared to bill he presented a year ago, and appears to leave the door ajar for PokerStars.

Broadly, the stakeholders are divided into two camps: the Pechanga coalition that is tribal that is against bad actors while the racetracks, and the Morongo tribal coalition, which is available to both.

Pechanga Might Derail Process

Pechanga has suggested that it may be ready to reach a compromise in the PokerStars question, if the tribes are able to cooperate together in the market because of the on-line poker giant, but it remains steadfast on its place towards the racetracks.

The issue of the racetracks remains a big sticking point while this might be considered progress, at least in one direction. Because the legalization of online poker would impact tax policy in California, it would want a two-thirds majority to be passed by the legislature, which probably means that it would require agreement from all events.

The racing that is pari-mutual, meanwhile, has stated it could oppose legislation that excluded it and Governor Jerry Brown has said he wouldn’t normally sign such legislation into law. Unless Pechanga changes its head, then, internet poker won’t be legalized in California this season.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.